BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow

2008-05-26 11:52:03
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow
From: Les Mikesell <les AT futuresource DOT com>
To: Hendrik Friedel <hen_mail AT web DOT de>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 10:52:40 -0500
Hendrik Friedel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> 3) The best choice was/is/seems to be to use rsyncd.
>> I got excellent network speed and all files were succesfully 
>> backed up. 
>> Compared to Samba you can use Includes and Excludes lists. So 
>> you get all the benefits from rsync, but save the extra work 
>> to setup SSH and root-access for the BackupPC user.
>>
>> So rsync is the way to go :-)
> 
> Sorry for the naiv question: 
> What's the difference between rsync and rsyncd as transfer method? (A link
> would be sufficient)

Rsyncd expects to talk to a standalone rsync in daemon mode; rsync 
expects to run over ssh.  On windows, rsync doesn't work right under 
cygwin sshd, so the standalone mode is the best approach.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    les AT futuresource DOT com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/