Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow
2008-05-26 11:52:03
Hendrik Friedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> 3) The best choice was/is/seems to be to use rsyncd.
>> I got excellent network speed and all files were succesfully
>> backed up.
>> Compared to Samba you can use Includes and Excludes lists. So
>> you get all the benefits from rsync, but save the extra work
>> to setup SSH and root-access for the BackupPC user.
>>
>> So rsync is the way to go :-)
>
> Sorry for the naiv question:
> What's the difference between rsync and rsyncd as transfer method? (A link
> would be sufficient)
Rsyncd expects to talk to a standalone rsync in daemon mode; rsync
expects to run over ssh. On windows, rsync doesn't work right under
cygwin sshd, so the standalone mode is the best approach.
--
Les Mikesell
les AT futuresource DOT com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|