Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow
2008-05-26 02:07:08
Hi,
> 3) The best choice was/is/seems to be to use rsyncd.
> I got excellent network speed and all files were succesfully
> backed up.
> Compared to Samba you can use Includes and Excludes lists. So
> you get all the benefits from rsync, but save the extra work
> to setup SSH and root-access for the BackupPC user.
>
> So rsync is the way to go :-)
Sorry for the naiv question:
What's the difference between rsync and rsyncd as transfer method? (A link
would be sufficient)
Greetings,
Hendrik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|