Re: GNU tar versions

Subject:	Re: GNU tar versions
From:	Toomas Aas <toomas.aas AT raad.tartu DOT ee>
To:	gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net
Date:	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:14:40 +0200

Gene Heskett wrote:

Or is that as simple as 'amrecover Daily'in the invocation?


According to 'man amrecover', it is.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar, (continued) Re: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar, Stefan G. Weichinger Re: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar, Jon LaBadie Re: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar, Paul Bijnens GNU tar versions (was: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar), Kurt Raschke Re: GNU tar versions, Andreas Sundstrom Re: GNU tar versions, Andreas Sundstrom Re: GNU tar versions (was: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar), Gene Heskett Re: GNU tar versions (was: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar), Gene Heskett Re: GNU tar versions, Toomas Aas Re: GNU tar versions, Gene Heskett Re: GNU tar versions, Toomas Aas <= Re: GNU tar versions, Gene Heskett Re: GNU tar versions, Gene Heskett Re: GNU tar versions (was: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar), Eric Siegerman Re: GNU tar versions (was: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar), Gene Heskett Re: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar, Gene Heskett Re: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar, Stefan G. Weichinger

Previous by Date:	Re: GNU tar versions (was: Backups failing on Solaris 9 with GNU tar), Gene Heskett
Next by Date:	Re: GNU tar versions, Gene Heskett
Previous by Thread:	Re: GNU tar versions, Gene Heskett
Next by Thread:	Re: GNU tar versions, Gene Heskett
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]