Are you using ext2 or ext3 as your file system? If not, check the file
system docs.
I ran into this problem with Amanda 2.4.4p1 on a RedHat 7.1 system but when
I switched to Suse 8.1, it went away. I could reproduce the problem with dd
but I was also using ext2 file systems. I don't what happens if you are
using something else. I know that Suse 8.1 dump won't work on a Reiser file
system although tar works just fine.
Dana Bourgeois
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
> [mailto:owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org] On Behalf Of Gene Heskett
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:53 AM
> To: Toomas Aas; amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
> Subject: Re: 2GB filesize limit?
>
>
> On Thursday 15 January 2004 05:27, Toomas Aas wrote:
> >> From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
> >> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:25:54 -0500
> >>
> >> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:42, William S. Bear wrote:
> >> >I'm trying to use Amanda to backup to disk (4TB RAID) using the
> >> >tapeless config from the FAQ. Dumps of the file systems
> are well
> >> >over 100GB, but Amanda appears to die with the following
> error once
> >> >the dump reaches 2GB:
> >>
> >> There is, or should be, a variable named chunksize within the
> >> amanda.conf holding disk description. If not there,
> you'll need it,
> >
> >Note that this parameter relates to holding disk, not the actual
> >backup image when backing up to hard disk.
>
> Sorry Toomas, I thought that was a given that most understood.
>
> >I'm sure this is not a hard-coded limitation of Amanda. I
> successfully
> >back up a 16 GB DLE to hard disk and I've never had any errors. The
> >backup image is stored as one 16 GB file.
> >
> >> As you can see above the chunksize is set for 1Gb. Now on
> my system,
> >> that would not be required, but there are still in use,
> filesystems
> >> which have file size limits of less than infinitity, typically 2GB,
> >
> >I don't think this is the problem here, since William said he can
> >create >2 GB files with dd and dump.
>
> Yes, that bit of incongruity bothered me too. And it got
> real curious
> when I realized he was writing to disk, so if he had the problem in
> the holdng disk he really, really should have had the same problem
> with the virtual tapes too since they use the same filesystem. I hit
> the send button somewhat confused, but thinking there might be a
> usefull clue someplace in my ramblings.
>
> >The most likely suspect to me seems to be the tapetype definition.
> >What's the length set to in the tapetype? If backing up to
> hard disk,
> >Amanda is said to "emulate" end of tape when hitting the
> limit set in
> >tapetype. Maybe 2 GB is the default when no limit is set?
>
> That I don't know, but a peruse of the code should answer
> that handily
> enough. Something I don't have time for this morning as I'm in the
> middle of a new vinyl on the kitchen floor, fresh 1/4 round etc.
>
> >--
> >Toomas Aas | toomas.aas AT raad.tartu DOT ee |
> >http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * No problem is so big
> that it can't
> >be run away from.
>
> --
> Cheers Toomas, Gene
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap,
> ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed
> Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby
> for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions
> to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by
> Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
>
>
|