Amanda-Users

RE: offsite strategies

2003-01-06 15:49:01
Subject: RE: offsite strategies
From: Darin Dugan <dddugan AT iastate DOT edu>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org, lebel AT lebel DOT org
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 13:54:25 -0600

Donald's suggestion is precisely what we're doing here. We choose to send the most recent (runspercycle * runtapes) set offsite, as it is the most valuable. Others may choose to send an older set offsite so as to be able to restore accidental-deletions from the most recent set. Choose according to your environment.

Cheers.

At 01:29 PM 1/6/2003, donald.ritchey AT exeloncorp DOT com wrote:
Suggest that you consider setting up a dump-cycle of 1 week, with a tape
cycle of three weeks (5 tapes/15 tapes for weekdays only, 7/21 tapes for
seven days-per-week cycles).  This will permit you to send out a complete
set of backup tapes once per week (for example, sending out the previous
weeks tapes on Monday) and getting back the set of tapes from two weeks
ago in exchange.  You then start reusing the three week-old tapes for the
current week.  You will need to have three sets of tapes, in case it takes
more than a day to exchange the tapes with your offsite repository.

Week    In-Use   Off-Site    To-Be-Reused

  1       Set3     Set2        Set1
  2       Set1     Set3        Set2
  3       Set2     Set1        Set3
  4       Set3     Set2        Set1
....

Because of the one-week dumpcycle, you will always have a complete set of
dumps of each file system in the off-site tape set.  It will grow
increasingly out-of-date during the week, but storing your local collection
of tapes in a fire-resistant vault should reduce your risks to an
acceptable level.

As always, "Your mileage may vary..."

Don
Donald L. (Don) Ritchey
Unix System and Network Administrator
E-mail:  Donald.Ritchey AT exeloncorp DOT com

-----Original Message-----
From: David Lebel [mailto:lebel AT lebel DOT org]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:19 PM
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Subject: offsite strategies

Hi!
I'm new to Amanda;  I'm more used to "traditional" solutions like
Networker or NetBackup.  That being said, the setup I'm currently
administrating has been put in place by my predecessor and I'm wondering
if people are using Amanda in an "offsite" strategy, where there is one
"cycle" of tapes offsite (usually a few weeks old) and another cycle
residing onsite (ie. the current ongoing cycle).

My point is that I would like to be able to store a full cycle offsite
in case of a disaster so I can full rebuild all my machines without the
worries of having only partials full backups.

Any hints?
Ciao,
  ..>David
--
// david lebel <lebel@{lebel.org,nobiaze.com,openbsd.org}> //
// http://www.lebel.org/           http://www.nobiaze.com/ //
// pgp: 3633 6999 D47E 73ED 099F  4341 08A4 8E48 EF56 61D1 //

************************************************************************
This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies.
This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments
to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any
printout. Thank You.
************************************************************************


Darin Dugan
System Administrator
Iowa State University Extension
dddugan AT iastate DOT edu
http://www.extension.iastate.edu



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>