Re: hi
2002-09-10 13:14:39
Multiple people have mentioned similar ideas: procmail and a filter.
I just set up spamassassin (http://www.spamassassin.org/) a week or so
ago and it has correctly identified all spam to this list, and almost
all spam vs. non-spam I've received on the rest of my accounts, too.
It sets up very nicely as the first (filter) rule of a procmail config.
It seems to be the de facto standard for spam filtering these days.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:22:32PM -0500, Tony Shadwick wrote:
> Honestly, it may seem a bit presumptuous, but most of us are probably on
> unix mail servers. It also seems obvious that most of us probably use
> procmail.
>
> That being the case, might I suggest using Spambouncer?
> http://www.spambouncer.org. Just add /path/to/spambouncer/folder/sb.rc to
> your list of recipes, and turn on the switches you want and you're set. I
> don't get spam. Period.
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- hi, Angel GrefurT
- hi, Angel GrefurT
- RE: hi, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM
- Re: hi, Gene Heskett
- Re: hi, Axel Schaefer
- Re: hi, Jon LaBadie
- Re: hi, Tony Shadwick
- Re: hi,
Brian Morris <=
- Re: hi, Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: hi, Greg A. Woods
- Re: hi, Dave Sherohman
- Re: hi, Greg A. Woods
- Re: hi, Dave Sherohman
RE: hi, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM
RE: hi, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM
RE: hi, Rebecca Pakish
|
|
|