Hello,

I am very sorry to learn that the Bareos website has created unpleasant
repercussion such as described in the email from Josip included below. 
For a more complete discussion of what really happened, please read the
following:

http://blog.bacula.org/more-bareos-unpleasant-repercusions/

Best regards,
Kern

On 03/29/2014 01:20 AM, Josip Almasi wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 02:07 AM, WebDawg wrote:
>> I see now that you are talking about how the code was also copied from
>> other sources but at first read it seems like Bacula is going to take
>> action against the users of bareos.
> Seems some of my code got involved there.
> I was quite unpleasantly surprised to learn that the hardlink 
> performance patch I wrote is the first argument on bareos list of 'why 
> fork'.
>
> Let me make it clear:
> I contributed to Bacula project.
> I do not support the fork.
>
> Not that it matters, it's open source and anyone is free to do with it 
> whatever.
> But this fork mess with laywers and everything...
> The exact opposite of open source.
>
> Regards...
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users