Re: [Bacula-users] Use modify time, not access time
2012-11-19 06:54:55
>>>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:12:19 +1100, Gary R Schmidt said:
>
> Thinking about it - if you "mv" a directory somewhere, and then "mv" it
> back, you have, effectively, created a new directory tree.
>
> Without looking at the source code, if I was writing the scanner, at
> *this* point I would mark that directory tree to be backed up, even if
> the name is the same you cannot know that the content is identical, for
> all you know that three was deleted and re-created.
>
> Why bother walking a tree that is new, once you know it is new, you back
> it up.
That won't work very well, because the ctime and mtime of a directory are also
modifed when you create a file in it.
__Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Bacula-users] Use modify time, not access time, (continued)
|
|
|