On 02/ 2/10 03:10 PM, Richard Scobie wrote:
> Robert Hartzell wrote:
>
>> It would seem reasonable (to me anyways) that the attributes would be
>> updated to reflect the current pool. There isn't much in the way of
>> documentation regarding this feature so hopefully someone can verify one
>> way or the other and I dont have to set up a test to find out.
>
> Sort of - a job running yesterday pulled 3 tapes from the "Scratch" pool
> into "Full" and while the retention time has been modified to the same
> as the Full pool, the "Recycle Pool" shows "None", not "Scratch" which
> is set in the "Full" pool definition.
>
> Perhaps this is a bug?
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard

hmmm... looks like I need to do some testing. Do you have any volumes 
that have been recycled and moved back to the scratch pool?

-- 
   Robert W Hartzell
bear at rwhartzell.net
   RwHartzell.Net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users