Re: [Bacula-users] Questions about the Scratch pool directive
2010-02-02 17:13:41
Robert Hartzell wrote:
> It would seem reasonable (to me anyways) that the attributes would be
> updated to reflect the current pool. There isn't much in the way of
> documentation regarding this feature so hopefully someone can verify one
> way or the other and I dont have to set up a test to find out.
Sort of - a job running yesterday pulled 3 tapes from the "Scratch" pool
into "Full" and while the retention time has been modified to the same
as the Full pool, the "Recycle Pool" shows "None", not "Scratch" which
is set in the "Full" pool definition.
Perhaps this is a bug?
Regards,
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|