Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?

2010-01-14 17:12:28
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?
From: Steve Costaras <stevecs AT chaven DOT com>
To: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:09:41 -0600

On 01/14/2010 15:59, Dan Langille wrote:
> Steve Costaras wrote:
>
> > I see the mtimeonly flag in the fileset options but there are many
> > caveats about using it as you will miss other files that may have been
> > copied over that have retained mtimes from before the last backup.
> > Since bacula does an MD5/SHA1 hash of all files I assumed (wrongly it
> > seems) that it would be smart enough to not back up files that it
> > already had backed up and are on tape.
>
> Smart enough?  Sheesh.  ;)
>
> That hash is to ensure the file is restored properly.  And for 
> verfication.  To do what you want is not easy.
>
> How big of a problem is this for you?
>
> Have you looked into the Virtual Backups, although I'm not sure this 
> would help you.

:)  Well I figured it would be relatively easy as an option (since the 
hash is in the database and when a file is read from disk for backup 
(since it's planning on backing it up anyway it would need to read the 
file, if the file name & hash match those that are in the database the 
file could be skipped.   (for 'real' completeness and to keep in line w/ 
the accurate option perhaps update the database with permissions et al 
on the inode but since the content matches that would save a lot of tapes).

In the case here it's rather a large issue (granted due to other 
problems like hardware or software issues that require restores of data 
and is NOT something that I want to continue, however we are living in 
an imperfect world) but to give you an idea the dataset size is about 
30-40TiB with restores anywhere from 2TiB to a full restore to back that 
back up again not only takes a LOT of tapes which is costly it also 
takes a LOT of time (day/weeks) where nothing else can be run.

What I have been doing which is just painful is do a full restore, then 
have to do a full backup right after then continue so a restore is 
actually the time of about 2x of a full.  (for a full set this is about 
9-10 days on LTO4).   This has happened about 3 times so far in the past 
2 months.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>