Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected
2010-01-06 14:22:43
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
>
> >> > I tried to do that years ago but I believe this made all tapes that
> >> > were already written to unreadable (and I now have 80) so I gave this
> >> > up. With my 5+ year old dual processor Opteron 248 server I get
> >> > 25MB/s to 45MB/s despools (which measures the actual tape rate) for
> >> > my LTO2 drives. The reason for the wide range seems to be
> >> > compression.
> >>
> >> Can anybody confirm or rebute this for 2.2.x? I'm currently fiddling
> >> with Maximum Block Size and a shiny new tape. It looks like 1M is too
> >> much for my tape drive, but 512K seems to work and it's making a huge
> >> difference: btape fill reports > 60 MB/s right at the beginning, then
> >> drops to abour 52 MB/s.
> >
> > With
> >
> > Maximum File Size = 5G
> > Maximum Block Size = 262144
> > Maximum Network Buffer Size = 262144
> >
> > I get up to 150M MB/s while despooling to LTO-4 drives. Maximum File
> > Size gave me some extra MB/s, I think it's as important as the Maximum
> > Block Size.
> >
>
> thanks for providing this hints. just searching why my lto-4 is writing
> just at 40mb/s. will try them out!
>
> searching the "Maximum File Size" in the manual I found this:
>
> If you are configuring an LTO-3 or LTO-4 tape, you probably will want to
> set the Maximum File Size to 2GB to avoid making the drive stop to write
> an EOF mark.
>
> maybe this is the reason for the "extra mb/s".
Modifying the Maximum Block Size to more than 262144 didn't change
much here. But changing the File Size did. Much.
Anyway, 40 MB/s seems a bit low, even with the defaults. Before tuning
our setup I got ~75 MB/s. Are you spooling the data to disk or writing
directly to tape?
Ralf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, (continued)
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Ralf Gross
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Thomas Mueller
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected,
Ralf Gross <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Thomas Mueller
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Ralf Gross
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Jesper Krogh
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Brian Debelius
- [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?, Steve Costaras
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?, Dan Langille
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?, Steve Costaras
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?, Martin Simmons
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?, Steve Costaras
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?, Dan Langille
|
|
|