Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected

2010-01-05 16:00:50
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected
From: Brian Debelius <bdebelius AT intelesyscorp DOT com>
To: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:58:19 -0500
That would be 16M.  Isn't the SD hard limited to 1M?


On 1/5/2010 3:00 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Brian Debelius wrote:
>    
>> I'm not seeing anywhere close to 60M/s (<  30 ).  I think I just fixed
>> that.  I increased the block size to 1M, and that seemed to really
>> increase the throughput, in the test I just did.  I will see tomorrow,
>> when it all runs.
>>      
> Yes, if you aren't already, whenever writing to tape you should almost
> without exception (and certainly on any modern tape drive) be using the
> largest block size that btape says your drive supports.
>
>
>    


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users