Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?)
2003-04-24 22:30:37
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> In the charts presented at the talk I was struck by the relationship between
> tape capacity and data rate. Assuming the maximum capacity tapes for the
> format, the data rate always seemed to be 1/10000th of the capacity (a small
> fudge factor is needed).
>
> For example, a Super DLT-220 has 110GB capacity, 11MB data rate.
> An Ultrium 1 with 100GB capacity has 10MB data rate (7.5 - 15 depending on
> manufac).
> A DDS-3 with 12GB has 1.0MB rate and a 5GB 8mm tape has a 0.5MB rate.
>
> An upshot of this is that no matter what format, writting a complete tape
> takes approximately 10000 seconds, nearly 3 hours. The technology
> improvements
> have not improved the time it takes to write a tape. Just how much you write
> in that time.
Hmm... I remember discussing this very metric with our vendor
several years ago, but this is not the conclusion we reached.
Some counter-examples:
DLT4000 20 GB 5.4 GB/h ~4 hours
DLT7000 35 GB 18.0 GB/h ~2 hours
DLT8000 40 GB 21.6 GB/h ~2 hours
Ok. Those aren't so far off, and the rest seem remarkably consistent
with the ~3 hour metric.
-Mitch
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?, (continued)
- hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Jeroen Heijungs
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Paul Bijnens
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Russell Adams
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Jon LaBadie
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Jon LaBadie
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Jon LaBadie
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?),
Mitch Collinsworth <=
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Russell Adams
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Mitch Collinsworth
- Using rhosts authentication ?, DK Smith
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Martin hepworth
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Gene Heskett
- Re: hardware vs software compression (was Re: amflush/amcheck not in sync?), Jon LaBadie
- amdump wrapper script (was: hardware vs software compression), Martin Schwarz
- Re: amdump wrapper script (was: hardware vs software compression), Gene Heskett
|
|
|