Thanks, I'll be upgrading soon.

What known bugs are in the update_bacula_tables scripts?

thanks,
Stephen


On 9/24/15 10:51 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:40:05AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I typically patch bacula pretty frequently, but I saw the somewhat
>> unusual notice on the latest release notes that warns it may not be
>> ready for use in production.  How stable is it?  I don't really have the
>> resources to test this out, but rather would have to go straight to
>> production with it.  I could always roll back, but that might entail the
>> recovery from dump of a 900GB database.  Opinions?
>>
>
> I upgraded five bacula instances of varying size over the last four
> weeks or so, starting with the smallest (all were on 7.0.5 compiled
> from source on CentOS), no issues so far apart from the little bugs in
> the update_bacula_tables script.
>
> Cheers, Uwe
>

-- 
Stephen Thompson               Berkeley Seismological Laboratory
stephen AT seismo.berkeley DOT edu    215 McCone Hall #4760
Office: 510.664.9177           University of California, Berkeley
Remote: 510.214.6506 (Tue,Wed) Berkeley, CA 94720-4760

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users