Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] is not a Bacula labeled Volume, because: ERR=block.c:1023 Re

2014-10-24 06:22:48
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] is not a Bacula labeled Volume, because: ERR=block.c:1023 Re
From: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:20:12 -0300
 From the little I have seen, it looks like your tape was never written 
(the data may be on another tape -- please check) or the tape was 
overwritten.  Using /dev/st0 could *possibly* cause the tape to be 
overwritten, but Bacula attempts to avoid that.

On 14-10-24 04:10 AM, Che_m wrote:
> I already did,
> found nothing useful than you should relabel it, or use /dev/nst0 instead of 
> /dev/st0.
> I've always used /dev/st0
>
> The correct tape is in the drive, the tape is labeled correct. I can mount 
> all 28 tapes in the library, except that one.
> The last status of the tape was marked "append" so, it is not in error or 
> anything. Neither have I archived it or taken it out to archive it.
>
> bacula version is v5.0.1 and is installed from ubuntu (10.04) repository
>
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by che AT belnet DOT be via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users