Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] why restore so slow after bscan?

2013-06-22 14:30:33
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] why restore so slow after bscan?
From: Jummo <jummo4 AT yahoo DOT de>
To: James Harper <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:13:52 +0200 (CEST)
Hi James,

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, James Harper wrote:

> I needed to restore from some old disk media which had long since been purged 
> from the catalog. I bscan'd it back in and started a restore but it's taking 
> _ages_. Normally a restore from disk gets started in seconds and then is 
> basically limited by network/media speed. This restore seems to still be 
> "seeking" on the disk after 5 minutes (based on status stor). It's like it 
> doesn't know where the file is so it has to re-scan the entire media...
>
I think there is are no Bootstrap files for the recovered jobs,
therefore Bacula has no information about the location of files on the
tapes.

Regards,

  - Jummo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users