[Bacula-users] why restore so slow after bscan?
2013-06-17 23:58:20
I needed to restore from some old disk media which had long since been purged
from the catalog. I bscan'd it back in and started a restore but it's taking
_ages_. Normally a restore from disk gets started in seconds and then is
basically limited by network/media speed. This restore seems to still be
"seeking" on the disk after 5 minutes (based on status stor). It's like it
doesn't know where the file is so it has to re-scan the entire media...
Is there something else I need to do in a bscan or does the bscan not import
all the required information so a seek is not possible?
Thanks
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] why restore so slow after bscan?,
James Harper <=
|
|
|