On 04/06/12 17:06, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> (No, I have not considered moving to Postgres. Honestly, Postgres 
> makes my teeth bleed.) 

It's a lot easier than it looks - and as a nice bonus you don't need to 
spend ages tuning it.


WRT the earlier comments about SSD data spooling: It's a BIG win if 
there are multiple simultaneous backups happening. Headseeks while 
spooling kill throughput and that's exactly what happens if there is 
more than one backup process accessing the area at once.

SSD on the database won't make much difference to backup speeds simply 
because the only thing it's going to affect is attribute despooling and 
that's only a tiny fraction of the overall backup time. It's a huge win 
for anything manipulating the database and when making dumps.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users