Oddbjørn Sjøgren wrote:
> It is also being written to as you can see).

It certainly looks as if the autochanger is "unstuck" now.

> Also, it seems from my web-interface that only a few of my tapes have bar
> codes. Is there a fast way to label all of them, and update the
> pool accordingly? Right now the pool seems to have volumes that refers to
> the old tapes (before the change). Is this correct? Also. The VolumName in
> the Pool, is it supposed to match the VolumeTag that I see from mtx status?
> Is this what Label does? Or is the VolumeTag something else?

The VolumeTag is the barcode label. It now looks as if you have a mixture of
tapes, some with and some without barcodes.

I would advise you to sort this out ASAP. I think you now need to decide how
the tapes will be managed, either with barcodes, or without them, and then
stick to that decision. Otherwise you may end up with a tape management
nightmare.

If the organisation has barcode labels available, I would use them - it's
far easier to manage the tapes that way.

I think the problems you have to solve now, are procedural and tape
management ones.

Allan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users