Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change
2008-12-10 18:10:58
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Brian Debelius wrote:
>
>
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>
>>> In linux, I find this to be completely wrong. I have 15TB of software
>>> raid 6 and the most load that it puts on the cpu is around 7% and
>>> these are raid arrays that net over 200MB/s writes on single core
>>> systems that are 3 or so years old.
>>>
>
>
>> So what do you think a reasonable cpu for bacula would be?
>>
>
> I'm running spooling on a 4 drive software raid0 quite happily on a 4Gb
> 3GHz P4D machine. The limiting factors are disk head seek time(*) when
> running concurrent backups to 2 LTO2 drives and available SATA ports.
> Because of that I'm considering dropping in solid state disks.
>
I've been wondering about those, but was thinking it would be better
used as DB storage for Mysql, where I/Os per second is going to be more
important than throughput. I see your point, though, where concurrent
jobs are running.
> (*) The SD array is more than fast enough to drive a single LTO4 drive for
> one backup, but when driving 2 LTO2 drives and running up to 6
> simultaneous backups, the heads thrash quite hard and throughput slows by
> 50%. Installing 15krpm drives over the existing 7500rpm ones won't help as
> that only reduces seek time by about 10-15%.
>
> This machine also has the Bacula director and Mysql on it, Mysql is the
> main memory hog, with the director coming in as the CPU hog. The biggest
> single problem is memory - due to the database size (40Gb bacula dumps)
> and the existing desktop-class motherboard is maxed out for that.
>
> AB
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, (continued)
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, thing
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Steven Jones
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change,
Josh Fisher <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Jesper Krogh
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Jesper Krogh
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Arno Lehmann
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Jesper Krogh
- Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Alan Brown
Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, thing
Re: [Bacula-users] Time for change, Wolfgang Denk
|
|
|