Brian Debelius wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> In linux, I find this to be completely wrong. I have 15TB of software
>> raid 6 and the most load that it puts on the cpu is around 7% and
>> these are raid arrays that net over 200MB/s writes on single core
>> systems that are 3 or so years old.
> So what do you think a reasonable cpu for bacula would be?

depends on what you are backing up. If its network backup your network 
is likely to be the first limit...

I have a dual core 1.6Ghz cerelon with 2.5gb of ram, my bottleneck is my 
scsi disks.....so if you have money to spend I'd suggest the disks and 
disk controllers are the priority.

regards

Steven

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users