John Drescher wrote:
> In linux, I find this to be completely wrong. I have 15TB of software
> raid 6 and the most load that it puts on the cpu is around 7% and
> these are raid arrays that net over 200MB/s writes on single core
> systems that are 3 or so years old.
So what do you think a reasonable cpu for bacula would be?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users