Hi,

07.04.2008 14:04, Drew Bentley wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>>  07.04.2008 06:04, Seth Miller wrote:
>>  > Hello all,
>>  >
>>  > I recently upgraded to Bacula 2.2.8 and have noticed something has
>>  > changed.  If a full backup has not yet completed and it's time for the
>>  > next incremental, that incremental is upgraded to a full and starts
>>  > running as shown below
...
> One way you could get around this is to make it so only 1 job can run
> at a time for a particular client. This will allow the full backup to
> complete and the incremental queued to not actually start until such
> job is completed.

But as the upgrade to level Full happens at schedule time, this 
doesn't prevent the new job to take very long again...

Arno

-- 
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
www.its-lehmann.de

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users