On 10.10.2013 20:00, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> On 2013-10-10 15:10, backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org wrote:
>> If Craig does not wish to integrate it into the package (and there may
>> be very good reasons not to ...
>
> It would be very nice to know what that reason is. Craig?
>
>
> It also bothers me that the rrdtool patch isn't upstream. However, as far
> as I know Craig has never explained why, nor officially accepted or
> rejected the patch. The problem here isn't Debian; it's the opacity of
> BackupPC development.

As far as I understand Craig intend neither simply accept nor reject patch but 
rather properly integrate it in to the project. And it is not high priority 
task.
http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-devel AT lists.sourceforge DOT 
net/msg00527.html
  
--
Alexander

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/