On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Chris Adamson
<chris.adamson AT mcri.edu DOT au> wrote:
> This is /usr/lib/perl5/File/RsyncP.pm
>
> 115 #
> 116 # Since the exclude arguments are no longer needed (they are
> 117 # passed via the socket, not the command-line args), update
> 118 # $rs->{rsyncOpts}
> 119 #
> 120 @{$rs->{rsyncArgs}} = @ARGV;
> 121
> 122 #
> 123 # Now process the rest of the arguments we care about
> 124 #
> 125 return if ( !$p->getoptions($rs->{rsyncOpts},
> 126 "block-size=i",
> 127 "devices|D",
> 128 "from0|0",
> 129 "group|g",
> 130 "hard-links|H",
> 131 "ignore-times|I",
> 132 "links|l",
> 133 "numeric-ids",
> 134 "owner|o",
> 135 "perms|p",
> 136 "protocol=i",
> 137 "recursive|r",
> 138 "relative|R",
> 139 "timeout",
> 140 "verbose|v+",
> 141 ) );
>
> Note that whole-file is not included in the list of options that it looks
> for, so it is ignored by RsyncP. This is 0.68 but it is the same deal in 0.70.
>
I don't see --one-file-system in that list either, but I know it is
honored because I use it everywhere. This must be the list that is
processed on the receiving side. Wouldn't whole-file be passed to the
sender and handled there?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
