On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Chris Adamson
<chris.adamson AT mcri.edu DOT au> wrote:
> I’m using backuppc to backup > 14TB of data on a local machine. I’m using
> the rsyncd option since tar does not detect deleted files in incrementals. I
> was trying to see if the –whole-file option in the rsync options avoided the
> delta xfer algorithm that is not important since it is not transferring over
> a network. I had a look in the RsyncP code and it ignores the –whole-file
> option. Could this be implemented in RsyncP since the backup rsync processes
> are very CPU bound and this slows down backups, particularly full backups.

Where are you finding that in the RsyncP code?   I see it always does
whole-file when sending (restores) but don't see anything about not
passing it to the other side for backups (but didn't look much beyond
a grep for 'whole'...).

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/