Re: [BackupPC-users] Poor BackupPC Performance
2011-07-28 17:47:50
Richard Shaw wrote at about 16:40:10 -0500 on Wednesday, July 27, 2011:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:42 PM, C. Ronoz <chronoz AT eproxy DOT nl> wrote:
> >> Depending on how comfortable you are building your own packages,
> >> Fedora has 3.2.1 almost ready to go. We had to package two perl
> >> modules for the added FTP support.
> >>
> >> If you are willing to try them but don't want to build yourself I
> >> could probably build them for you.
> > Sure, I'll try NetBackup 3.2.1. I have not build packages before myself,
> > although I wouldn't mind first using Fedora to see if the performance will
> > actually be good for me.
>
> It hasn't been released yet as the two perl modules in question are
> making their way through QA before they'll make it to the stable
> repos.
>
> I have built packages x86_64 packages, let me know if you need 32 bit
> packages instead.
>
>
> Richard
Any chances of backporting this to older Fedora versions? (I still run
Fedora 12)
That being said, I did build a 3.2.0 rpm package for Fedora 12 -- I
didn't add FTP dependencies so it works as is without any extra Perl
packages. I would be happy to share it if anybody is interested
(either the source or the binary rpm).
One of these days I will upgrade that to 3.2.1...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|