On Jul 26, 2011 5:00 AM, "C. Ronoz" <
chronoz AT eproxy DOT nl> wrote:
> I love BackupPC, it's so much simpler than Amanda and Bacula.
>
> Unfortunately it's performance is a 10-fold lower on my servers.
>
> Host User #Full Full Age (days) Full Size (GB) Speed (MB/s) #Incr Incr Age (days) Last Backup (days) State Last attempt
> antispam backuppc 1 2.0 1.98 2.53 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle
> directadmin01 backuppc 1 2.0 15.30 1.16 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle
> dns1 backuppc 1 2.0 2.44 1.43 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle
> dns2 backuppc 1 2.0 2.35 0.18 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle
> plesk01 backuppc 1 1.9 10.79 0.85 1 0.9 0.9 idle idle
>
> I wish to back-up a total of 20 servers, but I am not sure if I should pick BackupPC due to poor performance. The load on the servers is very low and rsnapshot/bacula back-ups often performed with speeds above 10MB per second.
>
> I have disabled compression as this caused a fairly high cpu load on the servers. The servers are connected via 1gbit network and no more than 2 simultanous back-ups are running.
>
> What performance have users here reached in terms of MB/sec for complete servers? And how poor is the 1.5MB/sec average I am having here? The servers have low load, the network performance is good.
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
> Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth
> analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to
> evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions.
>
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
>
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net> List:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:
http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net> Project:
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/