Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> 
> 
> Il 18.05.09 18:14, "Les Mikesell" <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com> ha scritto:
> 
>> In all cases, this would be skewed if you add the '-C' (compression)
>> option to the ssh command since that would happen before backuppc sees
>> the data.
> 
> And that's my case :-/
> Do you also think that the best approach is the iptables one?

I think the best approach is to have enough bandwidth that you don't 
need to worry about it - or at least can get by with tracking it at the 
interface or switch port level with an snmp tool like cacti or opennms. 
  If you need to count bytes between machines, ntop might work but it is 
a fairly big load on the server.  It is a handy thing to have around 
when you suspect some machines have viruses or just want to see the 
bandwidth hogs - http://www.ntop.org.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables 
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine 
for externally facing server and web deployment. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/