Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines
2009-08-18 07:43:06
man amanda.conf
compress [client|server] string
Default: client fast.
Set it to none if you don't want compression.
ig. compress none
Jean-Louis
stan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:26:10PM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Check system log
Post complete amandad.*.debug and sendbackup.*.debug.
You can try to disable client compression.
OK, I am very puzzled this morning. Some of the dum,ps failled on the
OpenBSD machines last night. I had thought that I had set up dumptypes for
them without compression. Here is what I did:
define dumptype stan-test {
global
comment "Non-root partitions on reasonably fast machines"
maxdumps 4
priority medium
}
And hee is the global def:
define dumptype global {
comment "Global definitions"
# This is quite useful for setting global parameters, so you don't have
# to type them everywhere. All dumptype definitions in this sample file
# do include these definitions, either directly or indirectly.
# There's nothing special about the name `global'; if you create any
# dumptype that does not contain the word `global' or the name of any
# other dumptype that contains it, these definitions won't apply.
# Note that these definitions may be overridden in other
# dumptypes, if the redefinitions appear *after* the `global'
# dumptype name.
# You may want to use this for globally enabling or disabling
# indexing, recording, etc. Some examples:
index yes
record yes
# split_diskbuffer "/raid/amanda"
# fallback_splitsize 64m
}
And here are the DLE's for the machine in question:
pblab wd0a stan-test 1 eth0
pblab wd0f stan-test 1 eth0
pblab wd0d stan-test 1 eth0
pblab wd0e stan-test 1 eth0
Should be no compression, right?
But look at what the sendnackup debug files have to say:
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 2865 Aug 17 22:52 sendbackup.20090817224841.debug
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 2959 Aug 17 22:55 sendbackup.20090817225226.debug
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 2851 Aug 17 22:56 sendbackup.20090817225558.debug
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 3298 Aug 17 22:56 sendbackup.20090817225623.debug
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 3195 Aug 17 22:56 sendbackup.20090817225638.debug
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 3192 Aug 17 22:56 sendbackup.20090817225655.debug
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 3190 Aug 17 22:57 sendbackup.20090817225728.debug
-rw-r----- 1 amanda wheel 3362 Aug 17 22:58 sendbackup.20090817225803.debug
Let's start off with why are there twice as many as I expect, based on the
DLE's?
The look at this:
$ grep -l gzip *backup*
sendbackup.20090817224841.debug
sendbackup.20090817225226.debug
sendbackup.20090817225558.debug
sendbackup.20090817225623.debug
sendbackup.20090817225638.debug
sendbackup.20090817225655.debug
sendbackup.20090817225728.debug
sendbackup.20090817225803.debug
I will atach a tarball with these files
I am very puzzled, at the moment.
Thanks for any clarification.
$
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, stan
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, Jean-Louis Martineau
- Message not available
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines,
Jean-Louis Martineau <=
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, stan
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, Jean-Louis Martineau
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, stan
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, Jean-Louis Martineau
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, stan
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, Jean-Louis Martineau
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, stan
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, stan
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, stan
- Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines, Dewey Hylton
|
|
|