Re: Problems with gtar
2006-10-14 07:01:07
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:17:14 +0100, Nick Pierpoint wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:57:05 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>>> On 2006-10-13 14:21, Nick Pierpoint wrote:
>>> > FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
>>> >
>>> > /-- rollins /home lev 1 FAILED [/bin/tar returned 2]
>>> > sendbackup: start [rollins:/home level 1]
>>> > sendbackup: info BACKUP=/bin/tar
>>> > sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/usr/bin/gzip -dc |/bin/tar -f... -
>>> > sendbackup: info COMPRESS_SUFFIX=.gz
>>> > sendbackup: info end
>>> > ? gtar: /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists/rollins_home_1.new:1: Invalid time
>>> > stamp
>>> > ? gtar: /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists/rollins_home_1.new:2: Invalid inode
>>> > number
>>> > | gtar: ./nick/.evolution/cache/tmp/spamd-socket-path-M7CcHJ: socket
>>> > ignored
>>> > | Total bytes written: 7639367680 (7.2GiB, 7.1MiB/s)
>>> > ? gtar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
>>> > sendbackup: error [/bin/tar returned 2]
>>> > \--------
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe you have a problem with the filesystem that holds /var.
>>> Is it full? Or is it corrupt? ...
>>>
>>> Gnutar creates a file in the directory /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists
>>> for its listed-incremental feature. And accessing that file somehow
>>> triggers the errors "Invalid time stamp" and "Invalid inode number".
>>> Maybe because /home is larger, and thus while backing up /home the
>>> error occurs, while backing up /etc, the listed-incremental file is
>>> much smaller, and does not trigger the error.
>>
>> Have you recently upgraded tar to 1.15?
>>
>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>>
>
> I think I started off with 1.15, but recent yum activity in my Fedora 5
> installation is:
>
> Sep 09 06:06:31 Updated: tar.i386 1.15.90-2.FC5
> Sep 15 04:16:45 Updated: tar.i386 1.15.91-1.FC5
> Sep 30 05:20:58 Updated: tar.i386 2:1.15.1-14.FC5
> Oct 03 05:16:58 Updated: tar.i386 2:1.15.1-15.FC5
> Oct 11 05:04:54 Updated: tar.i386 2:1.15.1-16.FC5
>
> I ran fsck on the filesystem and there were no problems. I also ran the
> tar command on its own and it completed ok so it would appear to be the
> amanda/tar combination that is the problem.
>
> I have deleted the gnutar files associated with the /home backup in
> /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists and this has at least given me a new full
> backup to set my mind at ease before the weekend.
>
> I'll monitor the incrementals over the weekend and see if the underlying
> issue remains.
>
> Thanks everyone for your advice so far.
Well last night's incremental seemed to work ok so perhaps now that the
gnutar-lists have been re-created the amanda/tar inconsistency is
removed.
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-MB OUT-MB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
-------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------
coltrane /etc 0 82 13 15.8 0:23 577.4 0:0040364.5
coltrane /home 0 15 13 87.0 0:091556.4 0:027510.6
rollins /etc 0 84 15 17.5 0:20 755.2 0:027262.2
rollins /home 2 466 207 44.5 0:534038.1 0:346176.6
(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.5p1)
|
|
|