Amanda-Users

Re: Problems with gtar

2006-10-14 07:01:07
Subject: Re: Problems with gtar
From: Nick Pierpoint <mail AT pierpoint DOT org>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:50:35 +0100
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:17:14 +0100, Nick Pierpoint wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:57:05 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>>> On 2006-10-13 14:21, Nick Pierpoint wrote:
>>> > FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
>>> > 
>>> > /--  rollins /home lev 1 FAILED [/bin/tar returned 2]
>>> > sendbackup: start [rollins:/home level 1]
>>> > sendbackup: info BACKUP=/bin/tar
>>> > sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/usr/bin/gzip -dc |/bin/tar -f... -
>>> > sendbackup: info COMPRESS_SUFFIX=.gz
>>> > sendbackup: info end
>>> > ? gtar: /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists/rollins_home_1.new:1: Invalid time 
>>> > stamp
>>> > ? gtar: /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists/rollins_home_1.new:2: Invalid inode 
>>> > number
>>> > | gtar: ./nick/.evolution/cache/tmp/spamd-socket-path-M7CcHJ: socket 
>>> > ignored
>>> > | Total bytes written: 7639367680 (7.2GiB, 7.1MiB/s)
>>> > ? gtar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
>>> > sendbackup: error [/bin/tar returned 2]
>>> > \--------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I believe you have a problem with the filesystem that holds /var.
>>> Is it full?  Or is it corrupt? ...
>>> 
>>> Gnutar creates a file in the directory /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists
>>> for its listed-incremental feature.  And accessing that file somehow
>>> triggers the errors "Invalid time stamp" and "Invalid inode number".
>>> Maybe because /home is larger, and thus while backing up /home the
>>> error occurs, while backing up /etc, the listed-incremental file is
>>> much smaller, and does not trigger the error.
>> 
>> Have you recently upgraded tar to 1.15?
>> 
>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>> 
> 
> I think I started off with 1.15, but recent yum activity in my Fedora 5
> installation is:
> 
> Sep 09 06:06:31 Updated: tar.i386 1.15.90-2.FC5
> Sep 15 04:16:45 Updated: tar.i386 1.15.91-1.FC5
> Sep 30 05:20:58 Updated: tar.i386 2:1.15.1-14.FC5
> Oct 03 05:16:58 Updated: tar.i386 2:1.15.1-15.FC5
> Oct 11 05:04:54 Updated: tar.i386 2:1.15.1-16.FC5
> 
> I ran fsck on the filesystem and there were no problems. I also ran the
> tar command on its own and it completed ok so it would appear to be the
> amanda/tar combination that is the problem.
> 
> I have deleted the gnutar files associated with the /home backup in
> /var/lib/amanda/gnutar-lists and this has at least given me a new full
> backup to set my mind at ease before the weekend.
> 
> I'll monitor the incrementals over the weekend and see if the underlying
> issue remains.
> 
> Thanks everyone for your advice so far.

Well last night's incremental seemed to work ok so perhaps now that the
gnutar-lists have been re-created the amanda/tar inconsistency is
removed.

DUMP SUMMARY:
                                     DUMPER STATS            TAPER STATS 
HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-MB OUT-MB COMP% MMM:SS  KB/s MMM:SS  KB/s
-------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------
coltrane     /etc        0      82     13  15.8   0:23 577.4   0:0040364.5
coltrane     /home       0      15     13  87.0   0:091556.4   0:027510.6
rollins      /etc        0      84     15  17.5   0:20 755.2   0:027262.2
rollins      /home       2     466    207  44.5   0:534038.1   0:346176.6

(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.5p1)






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>