Re: Defining a sensible backup routine
2006-04-19 05:28:55
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 22:50, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >
> > > If amcheck still complains show us a chunk of your config file
> > > around the problem line.
> >
> > maxpromotedays 0 # Ensure reasonable number of incrementals
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > dumpcycle 7 # The number of days in the normal dump cycle
> > runspercycle 7 # the number of amdump runs in dumpcycle days
> > # (4 weeks * 5 amdump runs per week -- just weekdays)
> >
> > maxpromoteday 0 # Ensure reasonable number of incrementals
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > tapecycle 21 tapes # the number of tapes in rotation
>
> Two entries for "same" parameter?
No - sorry about that. Since I mail from a different box I copy/past to/from
a text file. I picked up the first line by accident. The second version is
the current one.
>
> > (Ignore comments that no longer apply to settings -
> > I just haven't cleaned up yet)
>
> Few do.
:-)
Anne
pgpsvw2KRqCrP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine, (continued)
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine, Anne Wilson
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine, Jon LaBadie
- Forcing full backups on a regular basis, Gabriel O'Brien
- Re: Forcing full backups on a regular basis, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine, Anne Wilson
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine,
Anne Wilson <=
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine, Frank Smith
- Re: Defining a sensible backup routine, Anne Wilson
|
|
|