Re: Pornography
2003-03-20 20:59:53
At 2003-03-20T22:26:17Z, "Thomas Hu" <thomash AT date DOT com> writes:
> Have we enjoyed talking about spam so far? Is this still an "amanda" list?
> Are we interested in spam more than in amanda? Finally, is enough enough?
Hey, I run a spam farm, and want to use Amanda to backup my servers. Help
me?
Just kidding - please put down that gun!
--
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.
pgpug2H9orT0_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Pornography, (continued)
- Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
- Re: Pornography, Marty Shannon, RHCE
- Re: Pornography, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Pornography, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
- RE: Pornography, Thomas Hu
- Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
- [off-topic, hopefully final word: spam to amanda lists] Re: Pornography, Todd Kover
- Re: Pornography,
Kirk Strauser <=
- Re: Pornography, Dave Sherohman
- Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
- Re: Pornography, Chris Johnson
Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
Re: Pornography, Kirk Strauser
RE: Pornography, Seth, Wayne (Contractor)
|
|
|