The fact you actually need to pay a "VTL license" is just plain scary.

When u bought it, did they think you're gonna use it as a fileserver? I'm not 
to specialized into Data Domain, but arent they marketed as backup hardware? So 
you get a disk, but if you want to use it for something else than that, you 
need to pay a license?

Sorry for sounding bitter, but I've always heard people referring to Data 
Domain as a VTL.



Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Växel: 08-754 98 00
Fax: 08-754 97 30
daniel.sparrman AT exist DOT se
http://www.existgruppen.se
Posthusgatan 1 761 30 NORRTÄLJE



-----"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> skrev: -----


Till: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Från: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Datum: 09/27/2011 18:55
Ärende: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

On 09/27/2011 12:02 PM, Rick Adamson wrote:


> The bigger question I have is since the file based storage is
 > native to TSM why exactly is using a file based storage
 > not supported?

Not supported by what?

If you've got a DD, then the simplest way to connect it to TSM is via
files.  Some backup apps require something that looks like a library, in
which case you'd be buying the VTL license.

FWIW, if you're already in DD space, you're paying a pretty penny.  The
VTL license isn't chicken feed, I agree, but it's not a major component
of the total cost.


- Allen S. Rout