Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec
1998-09-15 10:15:38
Hi
What is most interesting about this topic is that there has yet to be a
reply from an IBM representative.
This is a common problem to which IBM has yet to offer a satisfactory
resolution.
To summarise the problem from my own experiences and that of messages in
this newsgroup:
ADSM restores are extremely slow when recovering a large number of small
files. This problem is particularly bad with Novell clients but is also true
for NT and UNIX. As this problem usually becomes apparent under the most
difficult circumstances; a disaster recovery, it is particularly worrying.
I am currently undertaking further tests on Novell and NT and would be most
interested to learn of others experiences too
Jason Warwick
Elsevier Science Ltd
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Jeff Connor
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Dave Larimer
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Dan Kronstadt
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Mapes, Mark
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Bill Colwell
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Brandon Moore
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Shane
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Christo Heuer
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, TJ Saijoen
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec,
jason <=
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Keenan Stratton
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Richard Sims
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, David Hendrix
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Carl Makin
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Gene Mangum
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Richard Sims
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Dan Kronstadt
- Re: ADSM versus Arcserve and Backup Exec, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
|
|
|