Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] OpsCenter Reprots, or Blat Reports

2010-03-24 15:03:47
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] OpsCenter Reprots, or Blat Reports
From: "Ron Jack (Systems Network)" <rjack AT nando DOT com>
To: "Lawler, Michael C." <MCLawler AT cooperstandard DOT com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:04:22 -0400
Lawler, Michael C. wrote:
> Good Afternoon all, I'm hopeing a scripting expert is lurking out there 
> someplace for me...or maybe not even an expert, but someone know understands 
> it better than I at least...
> 
> Currently I run a couple of reports manually and I'd like to automate them 
> thru OpsCenter if possible (we don't have Analytics licensed, so it's just 
> the base NOM upgrade) or through a Blat script if it's not possible to get it 
> from OpsCenter...
> 
> Here's what I'm in need of:
> 
> A report showing the backup status of a specific client (easy enough) and if 
> it's a status 1 a list of the skipped files that were missed (havn't gotten 
> his part figured out yet).
> 

bperror -U -problems -t BACKUP -hoursago 24 -columns 250 -client
client_name | egrep "file:"

> A report showing the media ID for the tapes that were used for all of the 
> daily backups for the last week, and another for the full backups used over 
> the weekend (to be run on Monday's and Friday's).
> 

bpimagelist -d 03/22/2010 -e 03/23/2010 -U -media

> Like I said, I get these easy enough by going into NBU and running the 
> reports there, but I don't have it automated yet.  For the skipped files I'm 
> currently going into the job details and doing a copy/paste to get the info 
> we need...not a huge hassle, but if it can be automated why do it by hand, 
> right?
> 
> Thanks for your help everyone.
> 
> - Mike
> 

command line equivalents to GUI reports, here:
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/247902.htm


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>