Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Full backup will not be idendtified

2011-05-16 11:29:18
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Full backup will not be idendtified
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Wouter Verhelst <wouter AT nixsys DOT be>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:26:09 -0400
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter AT nixsys DOT be> 
wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:43:51AM +0200, Robert Kromoser wrote:
>> Hi folks.
>>
>> In my configuration I have 2 files per client.
>> One file contains the storage definition (Archive Device)
>> and one file contains the directory directives.
>> I use one fileset definition named "SugarCRM_<xxxx>_Fileset" for
>> my three backup jobs SugarCRM_xxx_Full, SugarCRM_xxx_Diff
>> and SugarCRM_xxx_Incr where xxx is the name of the client.
>
> You should have one backup job, where you vary the level in the
> Schedule, not have three backup jobs with different levels. When bacula
> wants to do an incremental or differential backup job based on a full
> one which you did earlier, it will look for a job with the same name on
> which to base the backup; since you have different jobs, that doesn't
> work.

Yes. Agreed. It will not work  with 3 different Jobs.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>