On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, John Drescher<drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> 
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Victor Hugo dos
> Santos<listas.vhs AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

[...]

> You are not using the same exact dataset (145GB versus 140GB source
> data ) in both tests so its meaningless that GZIP6 is better than
> GZIP9.

yes.. one report is a little more big that other, but are the same
files in distinct dates and "only" 5GB of extra data !!!

IMHO, serves of base of comparative.

In the compression rate (point more important) of this 3 reports, the
difference between GZIP6 and GZIP9 is of 0.1% but elapsed time is
extremely distinct.

bye

-- 
-- 
Victor Hugo dos Santos
Linux Counter #224399

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users