BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Bad md5sums due to zero size (uncompressed) cpool files - WEIRD BUG

2011-10-07 03:58:09
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Bad md5sums due to zero size (uncompressed) cpool files - WEIRD BUG
From: Arnold Krille <arnold AT arnoldarts DOT de>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:56:13 +0200
On Friday 07 October 2011 01:41:45 Holger Parplies wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Les Mikesell wrote on 2011-10-06 18:17:06 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Bad 
md5sums due to zero size (uncompressed) cpool files - WEIRD BUG]:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Arnold Krille <arnold AT arnoldarts DOT de> 
wrote:
> > >> > No, it makes perfect sense for backuppc where the point is to keep
> > >> > as much history as possible online in a given space.
> > >> 
> > >> No, the point of backup is to be able to *restore* as much historical
> > >> data as possible.  Keeping the data is not the important part.
> > >>  Restoring it is.  Anything that is between storing data and
> > >> *restoring* that data is in the way of that job.
> > > 
> > > Actually the point of a backup is to restore the most recent version of
> > > <something> from just before the trouble (whatever that might be).
> > 
> > Yes, but throw in the fact that it may take some unpredictable amount
> > of time after the 'trouble' (which could have been accidentally
> > deleting a rarely used file) before anyone notices and you see why you
> > need some history available to restore from the version just before
> > the trouble.
> 
> I think you've all got it wrong. The real *point* of a backup is ...
> whatever the person doing the backup wants it for. For some people that
> might just be being able to say, "hey, we did all we could to preserve the
> data as long as legally required - too bad it didn't work out".

No, that case of archiving documents and communications to fulfill legal 
requirements is called an _archive_! And while such a thing works well on 
paper (and for paper-documents, provided you are good friends with the 
archive-lady), try to access any old electronic n a company after they 
switched from lotus to SAP in between. Still the data is archived according to 
the law.

> Usually, it
> seems to be sufficient that the data is stored, but some of us really *do*
> want to be able to *restore* it, too, while others are doing backups mainly
> for watching the progress. Fine. That's what the flexibility of BackupPC is
> for, right?

No one wants a backup. Everyone only wants restore.

Good thing backuppc can do backups that don't get in your way, restore that 
works simply by clicking in a web-interface and additionally write complete 
dumps to archive-media...

Have fun,

Arnold

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>