BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Fairly large backuppc pool (4TB) moved with backuppc_tarpccopy

2011-10-02 19:38:10
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Fairly large backuppc pool (4TB) moved with backuppc_tarpccopy
From: Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 AT gmail DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 18:36:26 -0500
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de> 
wrote:
> no, BackupPC is implemented in Perl, so no libc dependency there (actually,
> the wheezy package *does* introduce a libc6 dependency, ">= 2.0" seems to mean
> you can't run it on Debian versions prior to hamm :-); I'm not sure why the
> dependency is there).

Perhaps the same reason it exists in Fedora. There's a very small C
wrapper used. I believe this is used to prevent running perl as SUID.

Richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>