BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Fairly large backuppc pool (4TB) moved with backuppc_tarpccopy

2011-10-02 21:37:12
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Fairly large backuppc pool (4TB) moved with backuppc_tarpccopy
From: Mike Dresser <mdresser_l AT windsormachine DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:35:52 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:

> 2 follow-ups would be helpful:
> 1. Is this true for the other non-top-level attrib files?
> 2. Are the other f-mangled files in the directory also only have a
>   single link?
>   This would happen if there is a problem in the linking stage. In
>   fact, it's harder for me to understand how you would get unlinked
>   attrib files while having the f-mangled data files linked properly.

Please see previous reply where one can see the results of working on too 
many things at once, and picking the wrong pool to examine with a sharp 
stick...

Should all my fmangled files have an nlink over 1?  I think I need to read 
over the backuppc tech docs again...


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/