Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?
2008-09-04 10:51:10
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rob Owens wrote:
> Adam Goryachev wrote:
>> Holger Parplies wrote:
>>> a) rsync full backups are only minimally more expensive than incrementals in
>>> terms of bandwidth. Still, every file needs to be completely read from
>>> disk
>>> on both sides, so there is a good reason to offer an "incremental" mode
>>> as
>>> a speedup.
>> BTW, 2 x rsync incrementals of the same level will transfer more data
>> than one full + one incremental. So for example, doing 6 incrementals
>> followed by a full backup can in fact transfer a lot more data than
>> doing 7 full backups.
>>
>> eg, if a file changes after the full backup, then each incremental
>> backup will re-transfer those changes. While a full will transfer the
>> changes but the following full/incremental will not re-transfer those
>> changes.
>>
> This situation can be avoided by setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
>
> This way each incremental is based on the previous incremental, and not
> the previous full. (Assuming you get a full backup every 7 days).
Also assuming you use backuppc 3.0 or newer, which means it is not
available for me as I am using debian stable packages. (Although, I hear
the next debian stable should be out pretty soon, in which case I'll get
the newer version then :)
In the meantime, I simply doubled the frequancy of the full backups, and
adjusted the max keep values for full backups etc...
Regards,
Adam
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIv/XVGyoxogrTyiURAreAAJ4h/VB7dWgXfqB2RXgAd5+9cR+NtQCeIHSl
aXC1XUulRhpv7QPMhUdsH2w=
=HYZq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, (continued)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Christian Völker
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Rob Owens
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, dan
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Adam Goryachev
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Rob Owens
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?,
Adam Goryachev <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Rob Owens
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Adam Goryachev
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, dan
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Tino Schwarze
- [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Christian Völker
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental, Rob Owens
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), dan
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Stephen Vaughan
|
|
|