Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?)
2008-09-06 05:17:25
Hi,
dan wrote on 2008-09-05 21:26:25 -0600 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs.
Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?)]:
> the real difference between an rsync full and incremental in backuppc are
> the 3 following
>
> 1) a full has rsync ignore matching mtimes and checksum all files while and
> incremental trusts matching mtimes
> 2)backuppc has a different keep/delete schedule for fulls vs incrementals.
> 3)an incremental backup in backuppc only holds changed files and and backup
> is filled by the previous full backup
(make that "backup of next lower level" instead of "full backup"; also note
that you are using the term "filled" contrary to its meaning within BackupPC)
> while a full backup has no dependancy on another backup.
>
>
> there are no other differences.
... except
4) a full backup is based on the previous backup of any level (including
possibly a partial backup) and an incremental is based on the last
(successful) backup of the next lower level. Most of this has been
mentioned in this thread before.
5) Failed full backups are saved as partials, failed incrementals aren't.
> does that explain it??
That depends on how you define "explain". It doesn't detail the consequences,
but we've had that, and reducing it to the technical differences does add
another point of view.
Regards,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, (continued)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Tino Schwarze
- [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Christian Völker
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental, Rob Owens
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), dan
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?),
Holger Parplies <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Stephen Vaughan
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Raphael Alla
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?), Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental, Les Mikesell
Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Adam Goryachev
Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup through slow line?, Rob Owens
|
|
|