BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental

2008-09-04 08:15:52
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental
From: Rob Owens <rob.owens AT biochemfluidics DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:15:41 -0400
Christian,

Here is a good post on Full vs. Incremental from a year ago.  In
particular, check out the two threads that Holger links to.

http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT 
net/msg06101.html

-Rob

Christian Völker wrote:
> Yohoo!
> 
> |> I keep repeating this, so you might all be bored, but still:
> No, definetly not bored. For this it looks like it's too complicated :-\
> 
> |> When you factor pooling into the equasion, this means that the difference
> |> between rsync full and incremental backups is smaller than for tar/smb
> |> backups, which is yet far smaller than for tape backups for instance.
> Or, the
> |> other way around, for tape backups the difference is obvious, for
> tar/smb you
> |> can still see it clearly, while for rsync backups you have to look
> through a
> |> microscope. But it's still the same difference, and it's still there.
> | I like that explanation! :-) IMHO it should go to the Wiki.
> 
> I would prefer to have a more detailled explanation for this. As I want
> to understand what's going on it's not helpfull to compare things
> instead of giving examples.
> 
> So WHAT it the difference between an rsync full and incremental backup?
> What CAN be the microscopic differences?
> Let's say I have a running Linux server which I back up through rsync
> with default settings and I already have one successful full backup.
> 
> There are now two parts to look at:
> 1. The backup process itself
> 2. The stored backup
> 
> So what are the differences now between a full and incremental one?
> 
> Greetings
> 
> Christian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
********************************************************

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of this transmission in
error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this e-mail.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted lost, destroyed, arrive late or
incomplete, or contain viruses.
The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required please request a hard copy
version.

********************************************************


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>