On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:23:56AM +0200, Holger Parplies wrote:

> I keep repeating this, so you might all be bored, but still:

[...]

> When you factor pooling into the equasion, this means that the difference
> between rsync full and incremental backups is smaller than for tar/smb
> backups, which is yet far smaller than for tape backups for instance. Or, the
> other way around, for tape backups the difference is obvious, for tar/smb you
> can still see it clearly, while for rsync backups you have to look through a
> microscope. But it's still the same difference, and it's still there.

I like that explanation! :-) IMHO it should go to the Wiki.

Tino.

-- 
"What we nourish flourishes." - "Was wir nähren erblüht."

www.craniosacralzentrum.de
www.forteego.de

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/