Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Incremental
2008-09-06 12:36:29
Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> What about with multiple full backups, say your full backup is 50gig and you
> do a full backup once a week, will mean each full backup will use 50gigs of
> space? Or does the pool do some other linking between the data contained in
> each full backup?
All files with exactly the same content are pooled together regardless
of the source of the other matches. The actual size requirement for a
new full is somewhat unpredictable. If you have large files that change
even slightly (growing logs, unix mailboxes, database dumps, etc.),
you'll get a new copy in the pool where unchanged files will be linked.
The pooling check happens after the transfer, though. The comparison for
changes to transfer with the rsync method works against the filenames in
the prior full or full+incremental if you use incremental levels. A
growing logfile, for example, would have rsync send only the difference
while the backuppc side reconstructs a full copy merged with the old
content, then this new file would be added to the pool.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|