Re: Amflush failing silently
2003-02-10 17:08:31
Hi,
thanks for the info's, i'll try to get the trace on monday,
when the customer put's in the right tape(s) for amflush so i can run it.
If i can reproduce the problem, shall i install 2.4.4b1 on the machine to
see if this amflush fails too? If you say it's better then 2.4.3 i would
have no problems doing that.
Christoph
Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:27:34PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hi,
Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:32:01PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, but that can't be the problem, because this patch had been applied
*before* the last failing amflush.
And it does not show the described symptoms, amflush is not hanging and
not eating up memory and cpu-cycles, it simply terminates fast without
sending
an e-mail or doing anything it is expected to do.
Noe core-files laying around, it just marks the first matching tape as
used in the database and then terminates.
Any thoughts?
Could you run amflush under a debugger? I would like to know where it
crash?
If you can give me a brief instruction how i'll try it, i've never done
this before, so i don't know how.
$ gdb amflush
(gdb) run <config>
type 'where' on the gdb prompt when it crash.
Send me also the amflush log file.
Jean-Louis
Do you have the same problem with 2.4.4b1?
this is the main production-server of a customer of us, and i'm a bit scared
about installing "beta"-software on it, so i haven't try'd this yet.
If you consider it stable enough for production-use i'll try it.
I would have released the 2.4.4 stable this week-end if you haven't send
this bug report. It is better than 2.4.3.
Jean-Louis
|
|
|