On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:27, Christoph Scheeder wrote:

[...]
>>From Jean-Louis:
>> Do you have the same problem with 2.4.4b1?
>
>this is the main production-server of a customer of us, and i'm a
> bit scared about installing "beta"-software on it, so i haven't
> try'd this yet. If you consider it stable enough for
> production-use i'll try it.
>
>Christoph

Christoph; I've been building the 2.4.4b1 releases and using them 
here, usually within 12 hours of their release on Jean-Louis's 
site, with no known problems here, on a redhat8.0 box using a 
Seagate/Compaq 4 slot changer.  For me, thats 'production use'.

IMO, amanda is a moving target, getting better all the time, and its 
currently at least as stable as any 2.4.2 release ever was.  But 
that, and a buck twenty five will get you a cuppa most places.  

Here if it breaks, it hasn't broken a paying client, just me, but 
the list will be notified asap too.  Would I put it on a clients 
machinery?  In a heartbeat...

My $0.02, not adjusted for inflation. :)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.23% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly