On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:32:01PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks, but that can't be the problem, because this patch had been applied
> *before* the last failing amflush.
> And it does not show the described symptoms, amflush is not hanging and
> not eating up memory and cpu-cycles, it simply terminates fast without 
> sending
> an e-mail or doing anything it is expected to do.
> Noe core-files laying around, it just marks the first matching tape as used 
> in the database and then terminates.
> Any thoughts?

Could you run amflush under a debugger? I would like to know where it crash?
Do you have the same problem with 2.4.4b1?

Jean-Louis

> Christoph
> 
> Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb:
> >On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:14:35AM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>i have a problem with an amanda-2.4.3 installation and amflush.
> >>Problem
> >>multiple amanda-runs went to disk cause of tape-errors.
> >>only last run out of 3 shall be flushed to tape.
> >>Problem if i tell amflush only to flush run named "C:", for example,
> >>amflush does nothing, terminating without sending an e-mail.
> >>after that i have to run amcleanup, and in the generated e-mail it tells 
> >>me
> >>there where no files to flush, but the tape in the drive is marked as 
> >>used.
> >>If i move the other dir's out of the holding-area and do an amflush
> >>all works fine.
> >>
> >>AFAIR a similar problem was reported a few month back, but i couldn't find
> >>the messages in the mailinglist archives.
> >
> >
> >Read the 'double frees' thread on the amanda-hackers mailing list.
> >
> >Jean-Louis
> 

-- 
Jean-Louis Martineau             email: martineau AT IRO.UMontreal DOT CA 
Departement IRO, Universite de Montreal
C.P. 6128, Succ. CENTRE-VILLE    Tel: (514) 343-6111 ext. 3529
Montreal, Canada, H3C 3J7        Fax: (514) 343-5834